Direct answer
A resume represents what you have, not who you are. It records technical skills and formal track record, but what sets a person apart today is individuality, and that only appears in how they communicate, position themselves and reveal who they are off the page.
In the episode, everyone agrees on one point: the resume isn't dead, but it has shrunk. It still opens doors in entry-level roles and standardized processes, yet it captures only the technical part of experience. As Pedro puts it, the resume is a kind of bait. It says what you did, not who you are.
That distance is exactly the territory of the thesis. The resume is the language of Ter Poder: power tied to titles and achievements you must keep in order to be recognized. What doesn't fit on paper is the ground of Ser Poder, the power that doesn't depend on what you have accumulated for you to know who you are.
The great thing in life is being part of the collective without losing your individuality.
The practical question isn't whether you should abandon the resume. It's what of you survives when the paper isn't on the table. If the answer is very little, the work isn't on the document. It's on identity.